JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Anon" data-source="post: 528747" data-attributes="member: 2521">[QUOTE = "Anon, post: 528704, member: 2521"] [QUOTE = "Stick, post: 528238, member: 1874"] Hooked on the topic?))Hooked on the topic?)) ???? Bad translation?And bad translation, poor translation?The reason for most of the problems, according to the author, is one - the lack of spiritual development in people due to, firstly, the influence of external conditions and the environment, as well as the internal attitudes already formed under this influence, and secondly, the lack of desire in a person to change for the better due to various attachment, laziness and desire to enjoy. A person who does not strive for moral or spiritual development is likely to be skeptical about the book and try to find fault with phrases taken out of context, unscientific material or insufficient, in his opinion, validity. For such people, this book will really be useless. Since morality, as the book itself says, is an exclusively voluntary concept, to achieve real success in anything, a long and persistent independent conscious work on oneself is needed. And this assumes that a person should look for solutions to problems himself, and not try to find ready-made solutions. Therefore, this book can only serve as a kind of guide and a small impetus in self-study of oneself in order to begin a large and important work on themselves for those who do not doubt the need for this work, and therefore have already, at least, recognized their shortcomings and are determined to work on them.  The reason for most of the problems, according to the author, is one-the lack of spiritual development in people due to, first, the influence of external conditions and the environment, as well as internal attitudes that have already developed under this influence, and, secondly, the lack of desire in a person to change for the better due to various attachments, laziness and the desire to enjoy. A person who does not seek moral or spiritual development is likely to be skeptical of the book and try to find fault with phrases taken out of context, unscientific material or insufficient, in his opinion, validity. For such people, this book will really be useless. Since morality, as stated in the book itself, is an exclusively voluntary concept, to achieve real success in anything, you need a long and persistent independent conscious work on yourself. And this implies that a person should look for solutions to problems himself, and not try to find ready-made solutions. Therefore, this book can only serve as a kind of guide and a small push in self-study, to start a big and important work on yourself for those who do not doubt the need for this work, and therefore, at least, have recognized their shortcomings and are determined to work on them. [/ QUOTE]hello aunt, it's not that I'm stuck on some parts and quotes from the book. it looks more like he has a point of view, but the delivery and reasoning behind it are unrealistic and usable. thus, he cannot form complete concepts or ideas, and this comes out as mere opinions. he makes a lot of comments, but is it worth reading all that unbearable crap he writes? and as I said, I didn't get hung up on these points, but rather on them, where the book really wasn't worth reading because it becomes from a book on morality a book about some sick fiction about associating with sexual things in magnetic May, and the magnetic theory that he describes has no support or evidence, so it is more of his opposite, not people sick, but he must think that normal people think so. I can take the entire book out of context, but I don't have any point in that, since the statements he makes are absurd in themselves, and the main philosophies can debunk them in a matter of seconds. thus, he does not invent something new, but what he does is pray to the words of the Lattice Scientists and take their words out of context, like Nietzsche said at the beginning of the book. why not invent the words Sommer? if you are so creative. [/ QUOTE] like the words of Nietzsche at the beginning of the book. why not invent the words Sommer? if you are so creative. [/ QUOTE] like the words of Nietzsche at the beginning of the book. why not invent the words Sommer? if you are so creative. [/ QUOTE]согласно тому, что вы процитировали у него как "недостаток развития у людей из-за влияния внешних условий и окружающей среды, а также внутренних установок, которые уже сложились под этим влиянием", если вы можете изолировать человека от влияния того, что вокруг него и что происходит вокруг него, то что вы делаете? марионетка или безумное существо? - я могу сказать и то, и другое, поскольку социальные нормы нужно всегда рассматривать, и каждый сам решает, что ему делать. нет никакого мозгового кровоизлияния, как он описывает в своих словах. кто и что может промыть тебе мозги, если тебе все равно? и если вы настолько идивидуальны, что можете зависеть от того, что люди говорят и делают, а затем впадать в глупость, то что можно вылечить здесь? как вы знаете, каждый человек обладает различными интеллектуальными способностями, и они сильно отличаются. пример: бренд здесь продает рис с изображением золотого петуха, продажи которого взлетели до небес, и когда компания перепроектировала упаковку здесь на другую, никто долго ее не покупал. потому что люди настолько тупы, что если содержимое одно и то же, но упаковка другая, то они его не купят, а потом другие компании начали ставить золотого петуха на упаковку, и да, они тоже сделали продажи. так это вина компании, чтобы знать, как люди знают продукт, или это вина их интеллекта, чтобы знать, что "петушиный рис хорош на вкус". люди просто не знают ничего лучше, потому что большинство из них не умеют читать. теперь вторая цитата. (отсутствие желания у человека меняться к лучшему из-за различных привязанностей, лени и желания наслаждаться) какие решения</blockquote>

Проверка